Buying into a surgery center or ambulatory surgery center (ASC) can create an additional source of income and give a physician a greater stake in how care is delivered. It can also tie up a meaningful amount of capital, add debt, and concentrate more of your financial life in the same healthcare market that already supports your income.
The opportunity may look attractive on paper, but the decision is not simply whether the surgery center is profitable. The more useful question is whether the investment, its risks, and its timing make sense for you.
At Spaugh Dameron Tenny, we have helped multiple physicians evaluate surgery-center buy-in and ownership opportunities in the context of their financial goals and circumstances. Although no two offers are identical, the following questions can help you organize the financial aspects of the decision and identify where legal, tax, and operational review is needed.
An ambulatory surgery center is a distinct entity that provides surgical services to patients who generally do not require hospitalization. A physician buying into an ASC is purchasing an ownership interest in a business, not merely securing access to an operating room or adding another form of compensation.
That ownership interest may include rights to distributions and voting, but it may also carry restrictions, ongoing obligations, and exposure to business risk. Before focusing on a projected return, clarify what percentage you would own, which entity you would own it through, what rights attach to the interest, and whether the offer includes real estate or only the operating business.
Start with the ownership structure. Determine whether the offer is for an interest in the ASC's operating company, a separate real-estate entity, or both. Review your voting rights, access to financial information, restrictions on transferring the interest, and any obligations that may continue after the initial purchase.
A buy-in price is more meaningful when you understand the underlying valuation. Ask who prepared the valuation, when it was completed, which financial period it covers, and which assumptions have the greatest impact on the result. A valuation based on unusually strong recent earnings or aggressive growth assumptions warrants closer scrutiny.
Also ask whether you would purchase shares from an existing owner or contribute capital directly to the center. The economic effects can differ: one may compensate a departing owner, while the other may provide working capital to the business.
Review several years of financial statements and, when available, tax returns, case volume, payer mix, reimbursement trends, operating expenses, debt, and distributions. Look beyond revenue. A center may generate substantial revenue yet still face thin margins, high leverage, costly equipment needs, staffing pressures, or dependence on a small number of physicians.
Projected distributions are estimates, not guarantees. Ask how they were calculated and whether they assume you will move a specific number of eligible cases to the center. Then stress-test the projection under less favorable conditions, such as lower procedure volume, changes in reimbursement, higher labor costs, or a delay in reaching the expected capacity.
For a new center, projections may be the only financial evidence available. An established center offers operating history, but past results still do not guarantee future distributions.
| Factor | New Surgery Center | Established Surgery Center |
| Evidence available | Primarily forecasts, contracts, and development plans | Operating history, financial statements, and prior distributions |
| Common uncertainty | Opening timeline, case ramp-up, staffing, and construction or equipment costs | Sustainability of volume, facility needs, existing debt, and owner transitions |
| Key question | How much additional capital and time could be required before distributions begin? | Are the historical results repeatable after accounting for upcoming changes? |
A physician may use available cash, outside financing, or another funding structure permitted by the offering. The most attractive financing option is not always the one with the lowest initial payment. Review the interest rate, repayment period, collateral, personal-guarantee provisions, prepayment terms, and how the required payments compare with conservative distribution assumptions.
Borrowing can preserve cash, but it also creates a fixed obligation while distributions remain variable. Using cash avoids loan payments but reduces liquidity. The right tradeoff depends on the rest of your financial picture.
The initial purchase may not be the final amount you are asked to invest. Renovations, new equipment, expansion, operating shortfalls, or debt requirements can lead to additional capital needs. Review how capital calls are approved, how much notice owners receive, what happens if an owner cannot participate, and whether nonparticipation can dilute ownership interest.
Your ability to exit may be limited by the governing agreements. Employment changes, relocation, disability, retirement, loss of licensure, or a dispute with other owners could trigger a required sale. The agreement may also specify who can purchase the interest and how the repurchase price is calculated.
The surgery center should be evaluated alongside the rest of your finances, not in isolation. Your clinical income, practice ownership, and surgery-center investment may all depend on related economic, reimbursement, and regulatory conditions. That concentration can matter even when the center has strong financials.
Consider what the purchase would mean for cash reserves, student-loan repayment, retirement contributions, college funding, insurance needs, other investments, and near-term family goals. It is also worth modeling scenarios in which the investment requires more cash than expected or produces no distributions for a period of time.
Consider two physicians offered the same ownership interest at the same price. One has substantial cash reserves, manageable debt, and retirement savings already on track. The other carries significant student loans, recently purchased a home, and would need to reduce retirement contributions to cover the loan payment.
The surgery center's financial merits do not change, but the impact on each physician's plan does. For the first physician, the risk may be manageable. For the second, the investment could strain cash flow and other priorities, even if the projected return is appealing. This hypothetical example illustrates why the decision cannot be made based on the offering materials alone.
Physician ownership of a surgery center (ASC) can involve federal and state requirements. Under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, returns paid to physician-investors may implicate the law when those physicians refer patients to the center. The ASC safe harbor at 42 C.F.R. § 1001.952(r) sets out the conditions under which qualifying investment returns are protected. These conditions vary by ASC type and investor, so they should not be reduced to a general participation rule.
The federal physician self-referral law, commonly called the Stark Law, applies to referrals for designated health services payable by Medicare when a physician has a financial relationship with the entity, unless an exception applies. Whether it affects a particular ASC arrangement depends on the services and relationships involved. State self-referral rules, licensing requirements, and Certificate of Need laws may also apply and vary by location.
A healthcare attorney should review the offering documents, ownership agreement, and regulatory issues. A qualified tax professional should evaluate the entity's tax treatment, reporting requirements, and consequences for the individual physician. A financial planner can then incorporate that legal and tax input into the physician's cash flow, debt, risk, and long-term planning decisions.
There is no reliable standard buy-in amount. The price depends on the center's size, profitability, ownership percentage, debt, growth prospects, valuation method, and whether real estate is included. Rather than comparing the price to a broad industry range, evaluate the offer's valuation and cash flow demands.
Distributions generally depend on the entity's governing documents, ownership percentages, earnings, cash needs, debt obligations, and decisions by those authorized to manage the center. A projected distribution is not guaranteed, and the center may retain cash for operations, equipment, expansion, or debt repayment.
Yes. An ownership interest can decline in value or produce lower distributions than projected. Owners may also face debt payments, additional capital requests, transfer restrictions, or unfavorable repurchase terms. The risk of loss should be evaluated before relying on projected distributions to support the purchase.
A physician may use personal savings, financing from a bank or other lender, or another arrangement permitted by the offering. Review the interest rate, repayment period, collateral or personal-guarantee requirements, and whether payments remain manageable if distributions are delayed or lower than projected.
A coordinated review typically includes a healthcare attorney, a CPA or other qualified tax professional, and a financial planner. Depending on the offer, the physician may also need independent expertise in valuation, lending, or operations. Each professional should stay within their scope of practice while sharing the information needed to evaluate the full decision.
A surgery-center buy-in can be a meaningful opportunity, but the projected return is only one factor in the decision. Ownership terms, downside risk, exit provisions, financing, and effect on the rest of your financial life deserve equal attention.
Spaugh Dameron Tenny has helped multiple physicians determine whether buying into a surgery center was appropriate for their financial goals and circumstances. We can help you evaluate the personal financial implications, model different outcomes, and coordinate with your attorney, tax professional, lender, and other specialists so that the decision is considered in the context of your full financial picture.
If you are considering a surgery-center ownership opportunity and want to understand how it could affect your financial plan, start a conversation with one of our financial planners.
This article is for educational purposes and does not provide legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice. Laws and regulations can change, and their application depends on the facts of a particular arrangement.
CRN202909-11981590
Shane Tenny, CFP®, is Managing Partner of Spaugh Dameron Tenny, where he helps high-net-worth individuals and families navigate complex financial decisions with clarity, structure, and confidence. Since joining the firm in 2000, Shane has worked with clients through major financial transitions, including career changes, liquidity events, retirement, and multigenerational planning. His approach combines comprehensive financial planning with a focus on behavioral finance, including advanced studies in Behavioral Economics through the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Shane is the author of Your Next Million, former host of the Prosperous Doc® Podcast, and a nationally recognized financial advisor, speaker, and educator.
/Logo%20Horizontal%20(4).png?width=2000&name=Logo%20Horizontal%20(4).png)